In just under a month I have a new book out: The Palaeoartist's Handbook: Recreating Prehistoric Animals in Art, published by Crowood Press. This is a big (280 x 220 mm, 224 pages), full-colour, densely illustrated soft back entirely dedicated to the subject of palaeoartistry: its history, methods, execution and philosophy. It's going to be available internationally from the 27th of August in both physical and digital formats, and online retailers are already taking pre-orders for the cover cost of £22 or less (Amazon sale links: UK/US). I plan on having stock to sell signed copies from my website very soon, and a signing event is planned for TetZooCon 2018 - get your tickets for that here.
With the release impending, I figure it's time to start talking about the book to generate some buzz. The handbook is essentially a palaeoart textbook, containing a history of the genre, an overview of the process of reconstructing an extinct animal, notes on the life appearances of popular extinct taxa, discussions about the artistic and scientific requirements of the discipline and giving practical advice to aspiring palaeoartists. The goal of the book is to be accessible to newcomers while also interesting to veterans and enthusiasts. Sections demystifying geological and palaeontological jargon or introducing important concepts (finer divisions of geological time, phylogenetic bracketing etc.) should be useful to those just entering the discipline, while the detailed discussions, diagrams and citations should interest enthusiasts and professionals.
Wildlife Artist's Handbook (2013, Crowood Press). It occurred to me that, like conventional natural history art, palaeoart has a long history, its own theory and methods, good and bad practise, as well as a large body of practitioners, and yet we lack texts which discuss palaeoart as a learnable skill or discipline. Virtually all palaeoart books are collections of artwork, historic overviews or 'how to draw dinosaur' volumes, the latter often being of dubious scientific merit. The most detailed discussions of palaeoart theory are found in book chapters or articles, but they're limited in detail because of their lack of space. In writing this blog I've found that there's scope for long, detailed discourses on everything palaeoartistic: if even arcane topics such as extra-oral tissues or predicting horn shapes can justify a few thousand words a piece, then writing about the entire discipline would easily fill a book. Being impressed with the quality of The Wildlife Artist's Handbook, I contacted Crowood about creating a palaeoart equivalent and, 2.5 years later, we're almost at that August release date.
As you may expect from a book about artistry, the handbook is heavily illustrated. It has about 200 figures, photographs and paintings, as well as a large number of annotated diagrams. Not all the artworks are my own, however. Though happy to handle the diagrams and many of the paintings myself, I felt it would be inappropriate to illustrate the book exclusively with my own work - I fear giving the impression of putting my own work on a 'here's how to make palaeoart' pedestal. To that end, I reached out to eight of the most talented and interesting palaeoartists working today: Raven Amos, Julius Csotonyi, John Conway, Johan Egerkrans, Scott Hartman, Rebecca Groom, Bob Nicholls and Emily Willoughby, each of whom graciously donated several pieces of artwork. Their contribution not only makes the book a heck of a lot prettier but also demonstrates a broad stylistic range. The list of contributing artists could easily have been twice as long but, as I'm sure you can appreciate, finding content for this book was never a problem: fitting it all into a reasonably sized package was. Indeed, I had to request more words from the publishers midway through writing and the project ended up being 20,000 words longer than originally intended. This is not to say that the book is cluttered or over-stuffed - to the contrary, I actually find the layout quite comfortable to look at - but simply that we really pushed this one as far as we could go.
Contents page for The Palaeoartist's Handbook. Much of the book is devoted to the reconstruction process, but many other topics - history, composition, professional practise etc. - also feature. |
Chapter 2 is one of my favourite parts of the book: a history of palaeoart from the pre-scientific period right up to the modern day. So many histories of palaeoart are short and selective, often jumping from Duria Antiquior to Hawkins' Crystal Palace models, saying hello to Knight and Burian and then calling it a day. Such treatments omit many important details in the development of palaeoartistry - and I'm not just thinking about the reinvention of palaeoart inspired by the Dinosaur Renaissance. It should be more widely appreciated, for instance, that De la Beche's Duria Antiquior is not the oldest piece of palaeoart. It is widely labelled with this title but a number of works undeniably qualifying as palaeoart pre-date it by 30 years. De la Beche's painting broke new ground in some respects, but the terrain had already been cracked by several other scholars and artists. Another example: historic overviews often focus so much on Knight that they overlook other significant developments taking place in the early 20th century, such as the invention of hybrid 'scientist-palaeoartists' and their strong influence in the genre. While Knight was painting murals Harry Seeley was publishing Dragons of the Air (1901) and Gerhard Heilmann was producing The Origin of Birds (1926), books which contained very progressive takes on pterosaurs and dinosaurs and are clear precursors to the way we illustrate these animals today. I've tried to cram the handbook's overview of palaeoart history with as much information as possible and I feel it's a more comprehensive treatment than you'll find in many venues. It also features a brief section on palaeoart prior to science - my recent blog posts on griffins and cyclopes stemmed from research for this section.
We talk a lot about epidermal correlates at this blog (see here and here for recent examples) but they aren't as widely used as they should be. They're best known in centrosaurine horned dinosaurs thanks to Hieronymus et al. (2009), but occur widely across tetrapods. We're probably getting a lot of reconstructions wrong by ignoring them. Image from Witton (2018). |
Chapter nine drills down into the specifics of restoring tetrapod taxa. I originally envisaged this section as being bigger and encompassing more animal types, but non-tetrapods had to be cut to save space. The alternative would have been to include very brief notes on more taxa, but I fear the sin of error through omission: more detail about popular palaeoart subjects seemed the best compromise. Most major tetrapod groups are included, with specific sections on dinosaurs, pterosaurs, marine reptiles, different 'grades' of synapsids, temnospondyls and others.
Chapter 11 addresses the 'art' in 'palaeoart', talking about the interplay between science, composition and style. Discussions of palaeoart rarely stray into these areas, but they're important: there's no point getting your scientific details spot on if your artwork is an uncompelling mess. This chapter covers how our ideas about animal behaviour, their arrangement in a scene and relationship to the viewer are critical to making effective artwork, it being argued that some common palaeoart practises - extremes of perspective, and unrealistic shoutyroaryfighty behaviours - can make artwork less credible. Through liberal use of art by the contributing artists, choices of style and the advantages of different approaches are discussed. I'm a big fan of artists who push the stylistic boundaries of palaeoart and, after two centuries of relatively conservative approaches, consider bold stylisation to the next frontier of the medium. The utility of such styles is discussed, including whether they may sometimes be more 'honest' than our default approach of photo-realism (or, at least, in the orbit thereof): when animals are poorly known, is it more representative of our knowledge to use simpler, or looser styles than to hone every scale or hair to precision? This is becoming more of an issue as some species become incredibly well known to scientists and artists. Do we risk 'diluting' the impact of discoveries where we can plot every scale and pigment cell with certainty if we restore every animal as if this were the case?
The final, concluding chapter takes a look at the professional world of palaeoartistry. This section is aimed at those who commission artworks as well as those who create it, tackling subjects like what information artists need to plan and price a commission, the importance of feedback, and that all important topic: how to make a living from palaeoart. I'm afraid this chapter doesn't have an easy answer for the latter: hard work, talent, luck and shameless promotion remain hurdles between us all and palaeoart success. What a jip.
And that probably tells you everything you need to know if you're wondering whether this is a book for you. My ultimate aim was to make a book comprehensive enough to cover most questions anyone could have about how palaeoart is made, or at least give some idea where the answer could be found in other literature. It is, of course, impossible to cover everything about a topic as broad as palaeoart in a single book, but by placing an emphasis on methods as well as raw information I figure readers should gain sufficient knowledge of the field to answer questions on their own. And that's probably the most important lesson in the handbook: palaeoart is reliant on an evolving, changing set of data, so what's considered 'accurate' in 2018 may not be in ten years time. Training yourself to think scientifically, and to check information no matter where it's from, is just as important as learning how to paint or sculpt in palaeoartistry. If that's the message you take home from this project, I'll consider my job done.
The Palaeoartist's Handbook: Recreating Prehistoric Animals in Art, will be available internationally on August 27th, published by Crowood Press. Pre-orders can now be made at Amazon (UK/US) and at other retailers.
Enjoy monthly insights into palaeoart and fossil animal biology? Consider supporting this blog with a monthly micropayment, see bonus content, and get free stuff!
My work - including the writing of educational books like the handbook - is supported through Patreon, the site where you can help online content creators make a living. If you enjoy my content, please consider checking out my Patreon site - subscriptions start at $1 a month. That might seem pretty trivial, but if every reader pitched that amount I could work on books, artwork and other educational content full time. In return, you'll get access to my exclusive Patreon content: regular updates on research papers, books and paintings, including previews of another upcoming book. Plus, you get free stuff - prints, high quality images for printing, books, competitions - as my way of thanking you for your support. As always, huge thanks to everyone who already sponsors my work - without your help, the Palaeoartist's Handbook may not exist.References
- Garner, J. (2013). Wildlife Artist's Handbook. Crowood Press.
- Heilmann, Gerhard (1926). The Origin of Birds. London: Witherby.
- Hieronymus, T. L., Witmer, L. M., Tanke, D. H., & Currie, P. J. (2009). The facial integument of centrosaurine ceratopsids: morphological and histological correlates of novel skin structures. The Anatomical Record, 292(9), 1370-1396.
- Seeley, H. G. (1901). Dragons of the air: an account of extinct flying reptiles. Methuen & Company.
- Witton, M. P. (2018). The palaeoartist's handbook: recreating prehistoric animals in art. Crowood Press.
Will the physical edition be available in Canada? Amazon.ca is atm only listing a Kindle edition.
ReplyDeleteIt should be. I know that distributing books around the planet can take a while, so there may be a staggered roll-out for some countries. I'll ask my publishers for more details.
DeleteThank ye kindly!
DeleteA very interesting overview of your new book - I'm very much looking forward to reading it when it comes out.
ReplyDeleteThere's something interesting that I've been thinking about recently, and I'm not sure whether it might be useful to cover at some point (either in another book or blog post - I claim first dibs!):
I've been doing a piece inspired by the blood moon and it made me wonder whether it's important for palaeoartists to research topics such as palaeo-astrology, when reconstructing prehistoric night-time scenes. It a detail which seems to be often overlooked, but I'm not sure whether it's particularly important or an unnecessary detail - as it doesn't affect the quality of work or the credibility of the actual palaeoart aspect. However, I sort of feel that if we spend hours researching the subject matter/animal to make it a credible as possible, should we also spend as much time researching other details, such as the pattern of craters on the moon and the position of the stars at that specific time and place in prehistory?
I guess if you're creating artwork where such details are going to be visible then yes, we should be looking into these aspects as well. Obviously details of the Moon aren't going to be concerns for most palaeoart, but would fall under the general rule of getting background details right (e.g. correct plants, landscape features etc.).
DeleteIf you want realism, astrology of any kind, palaeo- or otherwise, should not be on your radar! Assuming you actually meant astroNOMY, there is little reason to be worried about lunar craters - most of them are very old, so unless you're planning on painting a night sky in the pre-Cambrian you probably don't need to worry. However, if you want realism, you certainly should not paint, say, a dinosaur scene with recognisable modern constellations. Firstly, the stars move (there are some nice simulations at http://orbitsimulator.com/gravitySimulatorCloud/properMotionHome.html), and secondly, some of the bright stars in our night sky are not that old. For example, Betelgeuse (the red supergiant in the top left corner of Orion) is only about 10 million years old, and Rigel (the blue supergiant on the opposite corner) is younger than that, so neither of them existed in the Cretaceous.
DeleteThis may seem like a weird question but how much will it weigh?:)
ReplyDeleteIt's important for international shipping.
According to Amazon.com, shipping weight is 1.8 pounds (0.8 kg).
DeleteVery excited about this book.
ReplyDeleteRaven's a good friend of mine--it's wonderful to see her illustrations featured in here. I have that Conchoraptor on the wall. :-)
I ALREADY WANT IT :D
ReplyDeleteReally excited for this. Well done Mark, it looks excellent.
ReplyDeleteNot to nitpick, but the Triceratops on your cover appears to be a young adult based on brow horn morphology--quite long and predominantly forward, but still with an upward fillip to the tip--so shouldn't it have more prominent scalloping on its frill? Is there a thick, fleshy layer of skin making skeletal details less visible? Is this something I just need to read the book to find out?
ReplyDeleteUm, okay... I guess that *is* to nitpick. Sorry. :(
(Still putting it on my Christmas wishlist, though!)
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteGood to know. Thanks!
DeleteHow do i get this via Amazon if i'm not in the US ?
ReplyDelete